ES Performance Analysis: Intraday Scalping vs. Buy-and-Hold Strategy

In trading, the return on investment (ROI) for a strategy can look similar on paper but differ significantly in practice due to varying capital requirements and risk exposures. Let’s analyze the performance of two strategies applied to the ES (E-mini S&P 500) futures market, illustrated by the green (Intraday Scalping) and blue (Buy and Hold) lines in the graph:

1. Overview of the Two Strategies

  • Green Line - Intraday Scalping Strategy:
    • Margin Requirement: $1,000 per contract, but using double the maximum drawdown for safety means $5,025 required capital.
    • Profit: $13,712.50
    • Approach: Designed for small, quick trades during intraday sessions, capitalizing on volatility without holding positions overnight.
  • Blue Line - Buy and Hold Strategy:
    • Margin Requirement: $10,000 per contract, with double the maximum drawdown for safety means $40,000 required capital.
    • Profit: $15,000
    • Approach: Positions are held overnight to capture longer-term market trends, requiring more margin and exposing the trader to overnight risks.

2. ROI Comparison

To evaluate the strategies, calculate the ROI (Return on Investment) for each approach:

Formula:

ROI = (Profit / Capital Required) * 100

Intraday Scalping ROI:

ROI = (13,712.50 / 5,025) * 100 = 272.9%

Buy and Hold ROI:

ROI = (15,000 / 40,000) * 100 = 37.5%

3. Key Insights

  • Capital Efficiency: The intraday scalping strategy generates an ROI of 272.9%, which is significantly higher than the buy-and-hold strategy's ROI of 37.5%.
  • Risk Management: Scalping’s maximum drawdown is $2,512.50, which is considerably lower than buy-and-hold’s required margin and exposure.
  • Profitability on Paper vs. Reality: While the $15,000 profit from buy-and-hold seems superior to scalping’s $13,712.50, achieving that profit requires 8 times more capital, reducing the relative effectiveness of the strategy.
  • Flexibility: The lower capital requirement of the intraday strategy makes it accessible to smaller traders and allows for diversification across multiple instruments or strategies.

4. Practical Implications

  • Smaller Account Advantage: Intraday scalping strategies are ideal for traders with smaller accounts who want to maximize their ROI and maintain flexibility in their capital allocation.
  • Buy-and-Hold Limitations: The buy-and-hold strategy, while simpler to execute, demands substantial capital and exposes traders to overnight risks like unexpected news or gaps in price.

5. Conclusion

The performance comparison between the intraday scalping and buy-and-hold strategies reveals that while both approaches yield similar profits on paper, their real-world implications are vastly different.

For a trader with $5,000 in capital, the intraday scalping strategy offers a higher ROI (272.9%), making it the more efficient choice. On the other hand, the buy-and-hold strategy requires $40,000 to achieve a slightly better profit, yielding a much lower ROI of 37.5%.

This analysis underscores the importance of considering capital requirements, risk exposure, and ROI when evaluating the effectiveness of trading strategies. Scalping not only maximizes capital efficiency but also reduces risk, making it an excellent choice for traders looking to optimize their returns in the ES futures market.

Back to blog